Last Thursday, apparently, 72% of the UK electorate voted by rather under 17 and a half million to rather over 16 million voters that about 5 million other people currently usually resident in the UK were not welcome to be so. This was democracy - at least if you accept that the demos is to be defined by citizenship rather than residency. Of course, that is not what was officially being voted on, and so far as a considerable number of voters on both sides were concerned, it was not what they considered themselves to be voting on - but, seeing that migration was the predominant topic of Leave propaganda during the final three weeks of the campaign, it is not hard to see why quite a sizeable number of people seem to think it was.
This makes me far from happy. Several of my friends, or at least acquaintances with whom I get on well, are among those five million. Quite a few more may be UK citizens now but were not born so. And some are no longer living in the UK because current UK immigration law, even before any Brexit-induced changes, made it impossible for them to establish permanent residence here. Some of them are here on LJ. Interestingly, some in each of these categories are both white (at least to all appearance) and non-European - not fitting either of the current British migrant stereotypes. That does not make the situation better, except possibly personally for them - in fact, it probably makes it worse, as so many other people who are seen as fitting one of the stereotypes has had to be coping with increasingly repeated abuse.
Was the decision democratic? Perhaps, perhaps not. Precedents within UK electoral practice can be found for both citizenship and residency as a determinant, with the more common one probably being citizenship. And the decision to use citizenship this time was explicitly taken, so it at least followed the accepted rules - at least so far as what was officially being voted on is concerned. So, at any rate to that extent, it needs to be accepted - particularly as people, not just in the UK or even in the EU but throughout the world (including any currently-inhabited satellites), need some certainty as to which decision has been taken. Any usable acceptance of reality relies on mutual trust. But intolerance of others was not a matter that was supposed to be part of the agreed question - and any attempt now to suggest that it was must be firmly rejected.
I have more to say, almost all of it deeply discouraging, about post-referendum politics in Britain and the prospects for withdrawal negotiations - if I can find the time, the words and the will. But that had better be it for now.
(or acceptable substitute) and Happy New Year (or acceptable substitute) to all my friends (and anyone else reading here).
My comments on this year to follow in a few days (or not as the case may be).
The schedule for Thursday's seven-way debate in the current UK general election campaign looks suspiciously like a solution grid for a certain type of logic puzzle. So, while I'm not willing to time-waste to the point of reverse-engineering the whole thing, here's a possible start:
1. The politician standing three places to the right of the politician who is first to make their opening statement answers the fourth question immediately before the politician who is the last to answer the second question.
2. The penultimate politician to make their closing statement stands immediately to the left of the politician who answers the second question immediately before the second politician to answer the third question.
3. The last politician to answer the third question stands three places to the right of the politician due to make their closing remarks immediately after the politician who stands immediately to the left of the politician whose opening statement is due two turns before that of the politician whose answer to the first question is immediately before that of the politician who stands immediately to the right of the last politician to make their opening statement.
4.... [Continue as seems appropriate]
for the current holiday period (appropriate name left for the reader to decide upon) and the year to come (exact appropriate period also left for the reader to decide upon - though I'd tend to assume that its length approximates to the time taken by the local planet to orbit the local sun).