Log in

Peter Wilkinson's Journal

Recent Entries

You are viewing the most recent 25 entries.

31st December 2017

8:17pm: A fallback message arrangement
Since I'm intentionally not publishing an email address here at the moment and my current email setup doesn't seem to be 100% reliable for incoming mail, I'm creating this entry for people who don't have an email address for me or do have one but suspect that emails aren't getting through.

Comments to this entry will all be screened so that any private messages hopefully won't get released to the rest of the universe.

21st August 2016

10:08am: Watching MidAmeriCon from a distance
So as not to break with something of a tradition of a number of years' standing, I have set up a temporary public friends group of LJers attending MidAmeriCon.

Sorry that it's rather shorter and later in appearing than usual. So far, all the LJs listed were already on my friends list but, if I spot others posting from or about MidAmeriCon who are not on the list, I may add them - though I might drop some of them again in a few weeks once it has receded into the distance. However, if you are a new addition, friending me back or having met me in real life or writing interestingly enough in your LJ that I have to keep reading it are good tactics for keeping you on my friends list.

If you spot any interesting LJs or LJ feeds about MidAmeriCon, please feel free to comment here to tell me about them.

29th June 2016

8:55am: Some post-referendum thoughts
Last Thursday, apparently, 72% of the UK electorate voted by rather under 17 and a half million to rather over 16 million voters that about 5 million other people currently usually resident in the UK were not welcome to be so. This was democracy - at least if you accept that the demos is to be defined by citizenship rather than residency. Of course, that is not what was officially being voted on, and so far as a considerable number of voters on both sides were concerned, it was not what they considered themselves to be voting on - but, seeing that migration was the predominant topic of Leave propaganda during the final three weeks of the campaign, it is not hard to see why quite a sizeable number of people seem to think it was.

This makes me far from happy. Several of my friends, or at least acquaintances with whom I get on well, are among those five million. Quite a few more may be UK citizens now but were not born so. And some are no longer living in the UK because current UK immigration law, even before any Brexit-induced changes, made it impossible for them to establish permanent residence here. Some of them are here on LJ. Interestingly, some in each of these categories are both white (at least to all appearance) and non-European - not fitting either of the current British migrant stereotypes. That does not make the situation better, except possibly personally for them - in fact, it probably makes it worse, as so many other people who are seen as fitting one of the stereotypes has had to be coping with increasingly repeated abuse.

Was the decision democratic? Perhaps, perhaps not. Precedents within UK electoral practice can be found for both citizenship and residency as a determinant, with the more common one probably being citizenship. And the decision to use citizenship this time was explicitly taken, so it at least followed the accepted rules - at least so far as what was officially being voted on is concerned. So, at any rate to that extent, it needs to be accepted - particularly as people, not just in the UK or even in the EU but throughout the world (including any currently-inhabited satellites), need some certainty as to which decision has been taken. Any usable acceptance of reality relies on mutual trust. But intolerance of others was not a matter that was supposed to be part of the agreed question - and any attempt now to suggest that it was must be firmly rejected.

I have more to say, almost all of it deeply discouraging, about post-referendum politics in Britain and the prospects for withdrawal negotiations - if I can find the time, the words and the will. But that had better be it for now.

22nd June 2016

2:16pm: Tomorrow's EU referendum
I will be voting Remain tomorrow and, if you are British, have a vote in the referendum and have any doubt about which way you should vote, you should do so too.
Read more...Collapse )

23rd February 2016

8:26pm: An open letter to Theresa Villiers, Northern Ireland Secretary of State and MP for Chipping Barnet
Dear Ms Villiers

As one of your constituents, with some Irish friends from both sides of the border, I was interested but slightly perplexed by your remarks in an interview today that suggest that the common travel area arrangements between the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland could be expected to continue largely unchanged in the event of a Leave victory in the referendum later this year.

Read more...Collapse )
Yours sincerely

Peter Wilkinson

24th December 2015

11:20pm: Merry Christmas....
(or acceptable substitute) and Happy New Year (or acceptable substitute) to all my friends (and anyone else reading here).

My comments on this year to follow in a few days (or not as the case may be).

20th August 2015

1:02am: Watching Sasquan from a distance
Continuing with what has become something of a tradition for quite a few years now, I have set up a temporary public friends group of LJers attending Sasquan.

While, so far, all the LJs listed were already on my friends list, I will probably be adding a few others who look likely to be posting from or about Sasquan - though I may be dropping at least some of them again in a few weeks once it has receded into the distance. However, if you are one of the new additions, friending me back or having met me in real life or writing interestingly enough in your LJ that I have to keep reading it are good tactics for keeping you on my friends list.

If you spot any interesting LJs or LJ feeds about Sasquan, please feel free to comment here to tell me about them.

(Quasi-political addendum: Feel free to comment, but unlike most years, I will be moderating comments on this post, to try to avoid getting into unwanted arguments. If you want to work out what I may or may not find acceptable, please see my previous post.)
12:55am: How I voted on the Hugo ballot
I usually do another LJ post at this time of year, and it will be following this one very shortly - but, unlike most years, this year's Worldcon, by no apparent fault of the organisers, seems to be rather politically charged, to the extent that this will undoubtedly be reflected in commentary on it. So I am making this rather belated post about how I voted in the Hugos, to try to make my own perspective fairly clear and, hopefully, avoid  getting into arguments not intended on either side and which I am unlikely to have the time and patience to deal with.

Having said that, do feel free to comment - but please note that, this year, I will be moderating comments on these two posts.

General considerationsCollapse )

So, what did I come up with? Category by category...Collapse )

22nd April 2015

1:39am: You don't want the SNP controlling the next British government? Then (probably) vote Labour
During the last few days, the Conservative campaign in the current British general election has been busy raising the apparently awful spectre of the result being a British government controlled from behind the scenes by the Scottish National Party - and calling on voters to support the Conservatives to stop this happening. Unfortunately for them, unless this call is more successful in shifting support to them than all the tactics they have tried during the last six months taken together, current figures seem to show that this would simply increase SNP influence in the next parliament.

Background for anyone not familiar with the situationCollapse )

Sources, and assumed seat totals for SNP and minor partiesCollapse )

On current figures - Labour would have an effective choice of partnersCollapse )

a 2%+ swing to the Conservatives strengthens the SNP - unless there"s no early general electionCollapse )

But a similar swing to Labour produces a fairly stable governmentCollapse )

Of course, just because this is the situation nationally does not automatically mean that voting Labour is the best thing to do in every single British constituency - but that (if I have the time) is best discussed in another post

1st April 2015

12:17am: The debating politicians problem
The schedule for Thursday's seven-way debate in the current UK general election campaign looks suspiciously like a solution grid for a certain type of logic puzzle. So, while I'm not willing to time-waste to the point of reverse-engineering the whole thing, here's a possible start:

1. The politician standing three places to the right of the politician who is first to make their opening statement answers the fourth question immediately before the politician who is the last to answer the second question.

2. The penultimate politician to make their closing statement stands immediately to the left of the politician who answers the second question immediately before the second politician to answer the third question.

3. The last politician to answer the third question stands three places to the right of the politician due to make their closing remarks immediately after the politician who stands immediately to the left of the politician whose opening statement is due two turns before that of the politician whose answer to the first question is immediately before that of the politician who stands immediately to the right of the last politician to make their opening statement.

4.... [Continue as seems appropriate]

25th December 2014

12:20am: Best wishes...
for the current holiday period (appropriate name left for the reader to decide upon) and the year to come (exact appropriate period also left for the reader to decide upon - though I'd tend to assume that its length approximates to the time taken by the local planet to orbit the local sun).

18th September 2014

1:04am: Loncon - in LJ links
In my last post here, a day or two before Loncon, I mentioned that I was setting up a Loncon friends' filter. Well, there were some good Loncon-related posts on it, and it seemed a pity to lose track of them. They have certainly brought back some memories, as well as talking about a number of things I missed (or couldn't have expected to know about) at the time.

So I went through the posts and stored the links. And then I thought - why not share the links? Particularly since I haven't managed to do my own report (at least yet).

Long list of linksCollapse )

13th August 2014

8:45am: At LonCon 3, but still watching it
In most recent years, I have been watching Worldcon through other people's LJs. Well, this year, for the first time since Interaction in 2005, I'll actually be there and probably too busy to do much LJ reading, but why stop a tradition? I can always read it afterwards. So I have again set up a temporary public friends group of LJers attending LonCon 3.

While most of the LJs listed were already on my friends list, I have added a few others who look likely to be posting from or about LonCon 3 (including several who I was surprised I'd not friended years back). I may or may not be dropping a few of them again in a few weeks once Loncon has receded into the distance. However, you certainly won't be dropped if you friend me back or have met me in real life (or do so in the next few days for long enough for me to make the connection between you and your LJ) or write interestingly enough in your LJ (or feed into LJ) that I have to keep reading it.

There are already over sixty LJs in the friends group (more than I've ever had there before, I think - who said that LJ was dying?), but if you are at Loncon and want your LJ added, or you spot any other interesting LJs or LJ feeds about LonCon 3, please feel free to comment here to tell me.

5th August 2014

12:49am: Britain, World War I and the neutrality of Belgium
Could Britain have avoided declaring war on Germany 100 years ago tonight? As things stood by the evening of 4 August 1914, I think that it was politically impossible not to do so. But I am also fairly sure that that had not been inevitable two or three days earlier. Britain had other problems, particularly in Ireland, and no real reason for believing that fighting a European war would help solve them.

Britain's stated reason for declaring war on Germany, that Germany was violating Belgian neutrality, is (I believe) close to the real one. But it does gloss over some important factors. The German Empire had been formed several decades earlier by invasions of Denmark, Austria and France, and in none of these cases had Britain should the slightest inclination to go to war in their defence. And while none of them had a treaty declaring their neutrality, it is still difficult to believe that such a treaty would have caused Britain to go to war.

So what was different about Belgium? Read more...Collapse )

22nd May 2014

1:33am: Some thoughts on today's elections
European and local elections coming up - so one of my relatively rare politics and voting-related posts.

First, a declaration of my position: I'm a Labour Party member (even if an inactive one these days) and have always voted Labour. I will certainly be voting Labour in the European Parliament election next Thursday, and almost certainly for all three of my local Labour council candidates. So read my remarks bearing this in mind.

European elections...Collapse )in London...Collapse )and the rest of BritainCollapse )

And local elections in my areaCollapse )

So, my final plea - if you haven't voted by post already, get out and vote in the European elections today, and the local ones if you have them this year. And, in the Euros, please vote for a party that seems to have at least a plausible chance of winning at least one seat in your area - though preferably not for UKIP. For the locals, I probably don't know your area well enough to advise.

25th December 2013

12:32am: Best wishes to all...
as you celebrate/inveigh against/ignore as best you can (or other alternative - delete as applicable) the purported anniversary of the birth of someone who, on the (historically likely but far from certain) assumption that they even existed, was probably born at a quite different time of year (the claims for this time of year appear quite late historically and the date coincides with an apparently totally unconnected pre-existing festival);

And as you live (hopefully) through the forthcoming annual period which is supposedly denominated by the number of annual periods from that birth until now - except that the likeliest information we have about the actual date of the birth suggests that it took place several years before the date from which we are currently counting.

29th August 2013

11:50pm: Watching LoneStarCon 3 from a distance
As has become something of a tradition in most recent years, I've set up a temporary public friends group of LJers attending LoneStarCon 3.

While most of the LJs listed are already on my friends list, I have added a few others who look likely to be posting from or about LoneStarCon 3 - though I may be dropping at least some of them again in a few weeks once it has receded into the distance. However, if you are one of the new additions, friending me back or having met me in real life or writing interestingly enough in your LJ that I have to keep reading it are good tactics for keeping you on my friends list.

If you spot any interesting LJs, LJ feeds - or indeed other web resources - about LoneStarCon 3, please feel free to comment here to tell me about them.

14th April 2013

2:08am: ESFS Awards
If I am interpreting this entry in eurocon correctly (and after cross-referencing with this not quite complete list of nominations on Europa SF), this year's ESFS Award winners, announced at Eurocon in Kiev this weekend, are as follows:

European Grandmaster
Terry Pratchett (UK)
Iain Banks (UK)

Hall of Fame

Author: Andrei Valentinov (Ukraine)

Artist: Nikolai Redka (Ukraine)

Translator: Patrice and Viktoriya Lajoie (France)

Promoter: Istvan Burger (Hungary)

Publisher: Shiko (Ukraine)

Magazine: SFX (UK)

Spirit of Dedication

Performance: "Vash Vikhod"(?) (Your Move), "Raido" theatre (Ukraine)

Website: scifiportal.eu (Romania)

Illustrator: Katerina Bachilo (Russia)

Fanzine: Fandango (Ukraine)

Encouragement Awards

Stefan Cernohuby (Austria)
Ioana Visan (Romania)
Aleksandra Davydova (Russia)
Leonid Kaganov (Russia)
Livia Hlavackova (Slovakia)
Boris Georgiev (Georgia)
Julia Novakova (Czech Republic)
Oleg Silin (Ukraine)
Martin Vavpotic (Slovenia)
Anton Lik (Belarus)

Honorary Awards

Harry Harrison (in memoriam)
Boris Strugatsky (in memoriam)

31st March 2013

7:25pm: BSFA Award results
Best Novel

Winner: Jack Glass by Adam Roberts (Gollancz)

Dark Eden by Chris Beckett (Corvus)

Empty Space: a Haunting by M. John Harrison (Gollancz)

Intrusion by Ken Macleod (Orbit)

2312 by Kim Stanley Robinson (Orbit)

Best Short Story

Winner: “Adrift on the Sea of Rains” by Ian Sales (Whippleshield Books)

“Immersion” by Aliette de Bodard (Clarkesworld #69)

“The Flight of the Ravens” by Chris Butler (Immersion Press)

“Song of the body Cartographer” by Rochita Loenen-Ruiz (Phillipines Genre Stories)

“Limited Edition” by Tim Maughan (1.3, Arc Magazine)

“Three Moments of an Explosion” by China Mieville (Rejectamentalist Manifesto)

Best Artwork

Winner: Blacksheep for the cover of Adam Roberts’s Jack Glass (Gollancz)

Ben Baldwin for the cover of Dark Currents (Newcon Press)

Dominic Harman for the cover of Eric Brown’s Helix Wars (Rebellion)

Joey Hi-Fi for the cover of Simon Morden’s Thy Kingdom Come (Jurassic London)

Si Scott for the cover artwork for Chris Beckett’s Dark Eden (Corvus)

Best Non-Fiction

Winner: The World SF Blog, Chief Editor Lavie Tidhar

“The Complexity of the Humble Space Suit” by Karen Burnham (Rocket Science, Mutation Press)

“The Widening Gyre” by Paul Kincaid (Los Angeles Review of Books)

The Cambridge Companion to Fantasy Literature by Edward James and Farah Mendlesohn (Cambridge University Press)

The Shortlist Project by Maureen Kincaid Speller

22nd December 2012

11:53pm: Happy New Baktun
... and also any dates recurring on rather shorter and more familiar time-cycles that you choose to celebrate in the next week or so.

29th August 2012

6:45pm: Watching Chicon 7 from a distance
As has been the case in most recent years, I've set up a temporary public friends group of LJers attending Chicon 7.

While most of the LJs listed are already on my friends list, I have added others who look likely to be posting from or about Chicon 7 - though probably dropping at least some of them again in a few weeks once it has receded into the distance. However, if you are one of the new additions, friending me back or having met me in real life or writing interestingly enough in your LJ that I have to keep reading it are good tactics for keeping you on my friends list.

If you spot any interesting LJs, LJ feeds - or indeed other web resources - about Chicon 7, please feel free to comment here to tell me about them.

19th August 2012

11:55pm: British rowing's forgotten silver medallist
Sometime fifty years ago this summer (quite likely fifty years ago sometime last week), a young British woman of 19 or 20 with some rather odd luggage stood arguing with American border guards at Checkpoint Charlie. Yes, she knew what she was doing, she was expected in East Berlin, she had a formal invitation. After several hours of arguing, they let her (and her luggage) through. The people waiting for her on the other side of the border had given up on her coming and gone. She had to take a taxi to where she was going, and got there with only an hour to spare before her first race.

The young woman's name was Penny Chuter and, by all available accounts, she was the best British woman rower of her generation. On 19 August 1962, she won the silver medal in single sculls at the Women's European Rowing Championships, which were being held that year at Grünau, in the suburbs of East Berlin. The "odd luggage" was her sculls, though she borrowed an East German boat. Read more...Collapse )
And by now, very few seem aware that she was perhaps the most talented British rower in an admittedly weak period for British rowing.

5th May 2012

12:04am: Warning! Severe spatio-temporal anomalies in north London
Earlier today, I wondered whether a mysterious pattern of delays in the election count for London Mayor might indicate the existence of a black hole somewhere near Alexandra Palace. despotliz kindly pointed me, via the Guardian liveblog, to a rather more mundane explanation involvoing a power cut. However...

Two ballot boxes full of votes from Brent and Harrow constituency seem to have slipped into a wormhole yesterday evening and have only recently rematerialised in normal space-time, apparently somewhere in the region of Alexandra Palace. Moreover, this has apparently meant that, while the ballot papers were designed for scanning into an electronic counting system, they are now having to be counted by hand.

Actually, this brings back memories. Thirty years ago, plus or minus a couple of days, I went to my first "proper" (i.e. not student union) election count - I was standing as a Labour candidate for the local council. It wasn't exactly a good time to be a Labour candidate - for several months, the Social Democratic/Liberal Alliance had been attracting both Labour and Tory voters, except that the Falklands War was now at its height and the Tory voters had mostly moved back to Thatcher. In every local ward except one, the Tories took all the council seats, the Alliance candidates came next, leaving the Labour candidates trailing in last place. The one exception was that, in the one local ward where we already had a councillor (two over from where I was standing), we held onto that seat and gained another.

Except that in fact we hadn't. The next morning, someone realised that the voting figures for that ward did not properly add up, a search was done of the room where the count had taken place, and there were two still sealed ballot boxes under a table. The count was hurriedly restarted - this time resulting in three Tory councillors and exactly the same order of candidates as in all the other wards, except that I think that the top Labour candidate got a few more votes than the bottom Alliance one.

And this all took place just a few miles west of Alexandra Palace, and just a few miles east of Brent and Harrow. Could it have been the same wormhole?

4th May 2012

1:37pm: Is there a black hole near Alexandra Palace?
Having (as always) voted a straight Labour ticket yesterday in the London elections yesterday, I'm keeping more than half an eye on the counts for Mayor and Assembly - and I've noticed something.

For the Assembly election that takes place alongside the Mayoral one, London is divided into fourteen constituencies, and the counting of ballot papers for both Mayor and Assembly for each constituency is taking place at one of three different sites - Excel for five constituencies covering east and south-east London, Olympia for five constituencies covering west and south-west London, and Alexandra Palace for the remaining four, covering north London. The official LondonElects website is providing a more-or-less live feed of the count. However, four out of the fourteen constituencies seem to be counting distinctly more slowly than the rest (the figures for this are below the bar chart showing the current interim result) - and the four constituencies concerned are the ones being counted at Alexandra Palace.

Something near Alexandra Palace is clearly causing a temporal distortion - and, if one discounts sheer human inefficiency as a possible explanation, a nearby black hole looks like one of the more plausible alternatives. Memory tells me that this isn't the first time that election counts for London-wide elections at Alexandra Palace have been suspiciously slow compared with those elsewhere, so the black hole may have been there a while - though, if so, I can't explain why it doesn't seem to manifest between elections.

Though, to be honest, I'm not sure that I would discount human inefficiency - the organisation of at least one previous Alexandra Palace count, at which I was present, was undertaken by Barnet council staff (despite Alexandra Palace being in Haringey - I think it was because Barnet is the largest borough within the four constituencies), and over thirty years, I don't think I have ever known the level of organisation of a Barnet election count ever get above "satisfactory" (and it's often been below).

On the election itself, Boris Johnson is currently ahead of Ken Livingstone and looks almost certain to win (boo), but in my local constituency, Barnet and Camden, the Labour candidate looks like winning the seat from its long-standing incumbent and somewhat notorious Tory, Brian Coleman - even though within Barnet and Camden, Johnson is leading Livingstone by some distance. It looks as if I have been rather atypical in voting a straight party ticket.

31st March 2012

11:56pm: Awards shortlisting season...
You know that it's the Awards shortlisting season when the shouting starts - most spectacularly this year with Christopher Priest's elegantly-written invective on the Clarke Awards shortlist.

To start on a tangent - I have nominated four novels for the Hugos this year. Zoo City by Lauren Beukes (last year's Clarke winner, but eligible for the Hugos this year because of delayed American publication). The Islanders by a certain Christopher Priest. Embassytown by China Miéville. And Rule 34 by Charles Stross. That's right - leaving aside Zoo City, I've nominated Priest's latest novel, a novel he has labelled as an inferior one by a potentially great writer, and one whose inclusion on the Clarke shortlist he has called "indefensible". And nothing he has said has caused me to doubt my choices.
Some more detailed reaction...Collapse )
So, the nominees may be able to look after themselves, but the judges? Under these conditions, any panel confronted with any attack - even one consisting of M. John Harrison, John Clute, Christopher Priest, Ursula K. LeGuin and David Langford, attacked by a teenager with a couple of showy but nonsensical arguments - could find difficulty in responding. The judges may be an easy target, but then - any target working under rules that don't allow it to respond to attack is easy.
Powered by LiveJournal.com